Thursday, September 15, 2005

Roberts: In nobody's pocket

An eloquent editorial in yesterday's Wall Street Journal defended John Roberts against Boston Globe columnist Tom Oliphant's charge that Roberts would, as Chief Justice, begin "moving the foul lines" of U.S. law and wreaking havoc with the Constitution.

Any reasonable person listening to Judge Roberts yesterday could only conclude that a judge who, if anything, disappointed despairing conservatives because of the caution with which he approaches the revisiting of past court decisions, would not be cavalier with the Constitution itself, as Mr. Oliphant thinks. Judge Roberts appeared to be so conservative an umpire, in fact, that his most animated criticism of the Dred Scott decision, which protected slavery, was that the high court went beyond the facts of the case. It is hard to imagine an umpire such as that moving the strike zone.

The problem with being so non-activist -- so appropriately unimaginative, as Roberts is -- is that nobody can claim him as a political pawn. He has few truly impassioned defenders, as a result -- few except those who hope he will prove every bit as originalist as he sounds.


Anonymous said...

you might appreciate this. it turns out justice thomas is a socialist. heh.

Anonymous said...


I am out spreading the word
to all true supporters of zion evangelical lutheran church

I believe that readers of this blog
would be fascinated to read about
the great new book at

zion evangelical lutheran church