Monday, November 08, 2004

Can libertarians be G-philes?

NRO's Jonah Goldberg is monopolizing the funny, as usual:

One might ask if the Democrats really want to place so much emphasis on "ignorance" of the base as a defining difference between the parties. By all means let's break out the number-two pencils and pit the homeschoolers, tractor drivers, and Sunday-school teachers against the voters who wouldn't have shown up at the polls lest they miss a chance to meet P-Diddy.

There are other complaints as well. Take the two leading liberal columnists at the New York Times, Maureen Dowd and Paul Krugman. As we all know, one's a whining self-parody of a hysterical liberal who lets feminine emotion and fear defeat reason and fact in almost every column. The other used to date Michael Douglas.

2 comments:

marco said...

its actually amazing how much i hate krugman... good thing there are people like donald luskin around. http://poorandstupid.com/chronicle.asp

Clara said...

DON LUSKIN IS GOD!!!!! eeep-- can't believe I just said that.

His occasional pieces on www.nationalreview.com are great. Lots of snarkily captioned photos of America's Most Dangerous Liberal Pundit. It's almost too, too cruel.... I said "almost".